But getting people used to lies and believing that "tools are harmless, as long as they bring immediate benefits is goodwill" is terrible. Confuse the "result" and "process" narrative views of right and wrong to hide the real "ultimate goal" of "maintaining the opaque CCP regime" (social stability is only a "means" to achieve the goal), and then rationalize the internal suppression of human rights , freedom, and external erosion of democratic values, this is the real scary thing.
As China continues whatsapp database to glorify "dehumanizing sacrifices" to stabilize autocracy, we need more "active bystanders" In a huge social system, if too much emphasis is placed on stable, top-down centralized management, and the option of bottom-up is excluded, it will be enough to lock the system into "self-reinforcing", "only" The process of pursuing efficiency” (systematic scholars call it “efficiency trap”); once the system encounters an invisible foreign enemy or virus attack, or the environment changes drastically, the organization will not be able to “outline and see the problem at the beginning. ” the whole problem, and hastened its demise.
In the face of a once-in-a-century risk, the democratic system’s transparent monitoring and cooperation mechanism reveals its importance: it effectively allows system “early adopters” to play a key “problem identification” role at the beginning of the risk brewing. Ren Zhengfei: Huawei has entered a wartime state to adjust its strategic policy Photo Credit: WebMD Harvard professor Ervin Staub , himself a Nazi concentration camp survivor , has come to a rather thought-provoking conclusion after years of researching the causes of ethnic cleansing. Contrary to popular belief, he sees genocide as a continuum of destruction: beginning with the tiny acts of various "dehumanized" victims, as witnesses to bystanders